Big companies’ intentional late payments put a brake on job creation
A new European Payment Report from Intrum Justitia shows that small and medium sized enterprises (SME) are being squeezed by large corporation’s cashflow management across Europe.
One out of three SMEs says that not getting paid in time threatens the survival of the company.
A share representing 7.7 million enterprises say that they could hire more employees if they were paid faster and a great majority believe that the withholding of payments after due date is intentional.
Late payments, as well as long payment terms, cause trouble for enterprises all over Europe andthe consequences can be counted in lost jobs and growth opportunities. More than every third SME (34 %) say they could hire more employees if they were paid faster, according to the survey presented in Intrum Justitia’s annual European Payment Report. For this report, 9,440 companies were surveyed about payment duration and economics.
Furthermore, one in four of Europe’s large companies say they could hire more employees if they were paid faster, leading to substantial job potential in higher paying disciplines. In fact, Intrum Justitia’s survey reveals that 7.7 million companies across Europe could make more hires if they were compensated within a shorter time period.
Mikael Ericsson, CEO and president of Intrum Justitia, said:
“It is a market failure that costs job opportunities for millions of Europeans that big corporations deliberately force SMEs to finance their cashflow. As much as two out of five SMEs say late payments prohibit growth of the company.That large corporations use their much smaller sub-suppliers to act financier of their own cash-management processes is not only wrong, it also creates an imbalance in society.”
Intrum Justitia’s survey revealed that 45% of the SMEs say that they have accepted longer payment terms than they are comfortable with and 35% claim that the request to do so came from a large multinational client. Almost two thirds (63 %) claim that intentional late payments are among the main causes behind the delayed payments, suggesting that this problem could in large part be solved by new attitudes and guidelines.
Mikael continued:
“To put pressure on smaller companies to accept longer payment terms while creating instability, insecurity and fewer job opportunities cannot be in any business leaders’ long-term interest. On the contrary, there is a link between corporate responsibility for shorter payment times and a reduction in their long-term risk. I am convinced that questions about fair payment terms should be lifted high up on management’s agenda and become an integrated part of a modern company’s overall sustainability efforts.”
Late payments and/or long payment terms hurt enterprises of all sizes but the SMEs are less protected. In fact, 28% of the SMEs claim that they neither use bank guarantees, credit insurance, credit checks, pre-payment, debt collection, or factoring to protect them against bad payments. The corresponding figure for large companies is 9%. This discrepancy illustrates the extent to which small and medium sized companies are extremely vulnerable.
While Italy, Greece and Portugal are the three countries with the longest payment terms business-to-business, Italy, Portugal and Croatia are the three countries where enterprises report being paid the latest after bill due dates.
For the purposes of this survey, the UK was classified in Central Europe alongside Switzerland, the Netherlands, Germany, France and others. In this region, approximately two out of five (38%) businesses rate late payments as having mid to high consequence for their ability to hire new employees, which is highest of all regions.
Although this region has the lowest share of respondents that have experienced requests for longer payments (40%), it is in this part of Europe that late payments could have the most serious consequences for businesses. In fact, nearly two out of five (39%) businesses in this region said that late payments are threatening their survival.