Invoice-to-cash: Why receivables software belongs in the funding conversation
Sponsored content. This article was supplied by a third party and Business Money has been paid to publish it.
In invoice finance and asset-based lending, the sales ledger is the asset. A lender’s confidence in a facility depends on how clean, current and collectable that ledger is, and the borrower’s own cash position depends on the same thing. Yet in many SMEs the day-to-day work of raising invoices, chasing payment and matching receipts is still a patchwork of spreadsheets, email reminders and manual keying.
That’s why choosing the most ideal accounts receivable (AR) and invoicing software solution is more than an admin decision. Plooto, which serves more than 14,000 businesses across Canada and the US, describes its platform as handling receivables end to end: sending invoices, collecting payment, and syncing the result back to the accounting system. Whether or not it’s the right fit for a given business, that scope is a useful yardstick for any tool being considered.
Where manual receivables break down
The failure points are familiar. When collections are manual, invoices tend to stay unpaid for longer, reconciliation backlogs build up, and customers don’t always have an easy way to pay. None of this looks dramatic on any single invoice. Across a ledger of hundreds, it shows up as slower cash conversion, more disputes, and a harder conversation with a funder when the numbers don’t tie out.
What to look for in an AR and invoicing tool
Business owners comparing options can use a short checklist:
- Two-way accounting sync. The software should pull in customers and invoices from the accounting package and write payments back, rather than forcing the same data to be entered twice. Plooto, for example, lists integrations with QuickBooks, Xero and NetSuite. Double entry is where errors creep in.
- Payment choice for the customer. The easier it is for a customer to pay, the less friction between invoice and cash. Look for a range of methods, such as bank transfer and card, rather than a single route. Plooto cites EFT/ACH and credit card options.
- Real-time visibility. An owner, finance lead or lender should be able to see what’s been invoiced, what’s been paid and what’s still to come without assembling a report by hand.
- Controls and permissions. Custom approval rules and user permissions help ensure the right people are authorising payments and that there’s a clear trail of where money went.
- Fit for your geography and currencies. This one is easy to overlook. Payment rails differ by country, so check that the tool supports the markets you trade in.
Why this matters to funders as well as borrowers
For a lender, a borrower that invoices consistently and reconciles promptly is easier to monitor. In general, tidy receivables records make it simpler to verify debtor balances, spot slow payers early and understand how a facility is being used. That doesn’t replace the lender’s own due diligence, but it shortens the distance between the borrower’s data and the funder’s questions.
For the borrower, the benefit is more direct. Predictable collections mean fewer surprises when it’s time to cover payroll, suppliers or tax. A business that can see its incoming cash accurately is also better placed to decide how much working capital it needs, and whether a facility such as invoice finance fits its pattern of trading.
Testing before committing
The practical way to judge any receivables platform is to trial it on live work. Plooto offers a 30-day free trial with no credit card required, which is a reasonable template for what to ask any vendor. Pick a representative set of invoices, run them through the full cycle from issue to reconciliation, and track what changes: how long customers take to pay, how much time the team spends on follow-up, and how many entries still need to be made by hand.
It also helps to involve whoever uses the system most. Finance staff, bookkeepers and, where relevant, the broker or funder who relies on the ledger data will each notice different friction points.
The takeaway
Cash flow rarely fails because of one dramatic event. More often it erodes through small delays and small errors in the invoice-to-cash process. Automating that process won’t remove commercial risk, but it can make the ledger more accurate, more visible and easier to finance against. For SME owners weighing their options, and for the lenders who support them, a well-chosen receivables tool is part of that foundation.